The article tries to find out the primary relationship that exists between early childhood treatment and the elderly domestic as well as sexual violence among clients with severe mental illness (SMI), and it will also check on the same relationship basing on gender differences as well as probable mediators.
The author claims that individuals suffering from a severe mental illness (SMI) are at high danger for all types of violent victimization. The writer also suggests that victimization of both domestic and sexual violence in this group indicates higher levels of psychosocial morbidity from the aggression than in ordinary people. Individuals with SMI are very vulnerable as they suffer from a wide range of mental as well as physical morbidity, social disadvantage, and increased risk of premature deaths. Thus, the paper tries to look into these risk factors and come up with substantial ways of dealing with such incidences or lowering the early death cases.
The paper defines childhood maltreatment as the emotional, sexual, and physical abuse to a child or the emotional and physical neglecting of a child. The article alludes that there is a high risk of adult victimization that is related to childhood abuse as well as neglecting because of the rise in the threat of interpersonal aggression such as physical and sexual mistreatment. All forms of infant abuse or neglect heighten the danger of interpersonal violence in their grown-up age with no particular associations between the sub-forms of juvenile abuse and other forms of victimization in parenthood. Despite the fact that the same trend has been noted for both genders, the impact on elevated risk for the occasion “Forced into Unwanted Sex” was realized to be great among men than it is the case with women who have been mishandled during their youthful years.
The paper also concludes that in both the normal and the SMI populations, the ladies are in greater danger than men for domestic as well as sexual maltreatment during their parenthood. The paper suggests that the above is the core reason to as why they need to evaluate the most probable mediators as well as danger factors for such violence that is gender biased. Since the cause of any form of domestic as well as sexual ferocity is based on the individual traits of the offender; it can be tough to ascertain the ways by which an individual’s adverse juvenile experiences could raise the levels of which they are prone to violence at their grown-up years. The paper refers back to Grauerholz ecological model to propose that individual, interpersonal as well as a sociocultural factor that is associated with youthful abuse may heighten the exposure risks to potential offenders, or raise the probability that the probable perpetrators will act violently in specific incidences. The violent nature of an offender may be increased by the same factors that are related to childhood assault in the standard demographic group such as insufficient resources, social alienation, drug and substance abuse, stigmatization, and psychiatric symptoms. This assertion is based on the fact that these factor makes the offender feel authorized to act in violently or see himself or herself as an easy target. It may also because the same elements lower the person’s ability to efficiently respond to these stimuli.
The paper goes on to indicate that most of the factors which are taken to be the likely mediators of the close association between juvenile assault and the parenthood violence victimization that are high in populations with SMI regardless of any available history of abuse or assault. The paper also claims that there are top cases of juvenile crime among SMI patients which are highly associated with chronic psychiatric symptoms as well as more complicated clinical manifestation among this group of people. However, the article suggests that sexual and domestic violence among SMI clients is associated with their drug abuse, isolation, psychiatric disease, and juvenile assault history. The paper also notes the bias that has been prevalent in this study in that they were only based on ladies and excluding the men which make then not to provide sufficient confounding factors. Moreover, the article suggests that the relationships between parenthood vehemence position and the existence of various forms of juvenile maltreatment as well as abuse. The paper notes that the emotional assault in juveniles raises the likelihood of parenthood domestic as well as sexual ferocity victimization in both men and women. The finding offers a clear insight on the physical as well as emotional abuse which makes them prone to same maltreatment practices in their grown-up age. The bigger and stressful youthful experiences are known to impact the trajectory of one’s life adversely with regard to the complicated social as well behavioral results that may raise their exposure to aggressive acts of violence. The study also offers very vital information to health experts which they can employ in evaluating the client’s traumatic history and dealing with the complicated needs of the patients have been compromised (Anderson, 2016). It also suggests that the dangers of traumatization reoccurring in any environment has to be taken care of by the clinician. The article suggests that more studies have to be done so that a proper understanding of the different mechanism that associate juvenile abuse and their parenthood victimization. Interventions that are designed to assist clients with SMI conditions due to traumatic experiences in their young age may result in improvement of the clinical results.
I believe that the research article offers a real picture of the association between juvenile assaults and adulthood sexual as well as domestic vehemence among patients with SMI symptoms. This is because the author highlights one of the most important things that people neglect but has great influence in their future life. This consist of good social, intellectual, physical, as well as emotional growth of the child, which if disrupted it results in great harm to the life of the person during their parenthood years. Any maltreatment to the young person will increase his or her vulnerability to sexual violence as well as the domestic one since the person will use it serve as a tool to which he or she will prove his or her wrong deeds at adulthood. I also agree with the author that more studies have to be done to understand the mechanism that links childhood experiences and adulthood vulnerability to violent activities. I think this would help the clinicians in developing health interventions to assist the SMI clients in fully coming out of this tough conditions and leading a better and healthier life. The study was a success as it helped the other researchers identify the loopholes in their previous studies which they can use to better their studies in this field.